85th plenary meeting - 20 December 1993

INTRODUCTION

Background and current needs

Previous international action

Toward standard rules

Purpose and content of the Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities

Fundamental concepts in disability policy

PREAMBLE

I. PRECONDITIONS FOR EQUAL PARTICIPATION

Rule 1. Awareness-raising

Rule 2. Medical care

Rule 3. Rehabilitation

Rule 4. Support services

II. TARGET AREAS FOR EQUAL PARTICIPATION

Rule 5. Accessibility

Rule 6. Education

Rule 7. Employment

Rule 8. Income maintenance and social security

Rule 9. Family life and personal integrity

Rule 10. Culture

Rule 11. Recreation and sports

Rule 12. Religion

III. IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES

Rule 13. Information and research

Rule 14. Policy-making and planning

Rule 15. Legislation

Rule 16. Economic policies

Rule 17. Coordination of work

Rule 18. Organizations of persons with disabilities

Rule 19. Personnel training

Rule 20. National monitoring and evaluation of disability programmes in the

implementation of the Rules

Rule 21. Technical and economic cooperation

Rule 22. International cooperation

IV. MONITORING MECHANISM

The General Assembly,

Recalling Economic and Social Council resolution 1990/26 of 24 May 1990, in which the Council authorized the Commission for Social Development to consider, at its thirty-second session, the establishment of an ad hoc open-ended working group of government experts, funded by voluntary contributions, to elaborate standard rules on the equalization of opportunities for disabled children, youth and adults, in close collaboration with the specialized agencies, other intergovernmental bodies and non-governmental organizations, especially organizations of disabled persons, and requested the Commission, should it establish such a working group, to finalize the text of those rules for consideration by the Council in 1993 and for submission to the General Assembly at its forty-eighth session,

Also recalling that in its resolution 32/2 of 20 February 1991 the Commission for Social Development decided to establish an ad hoc open-ended working group of government experts in accordance with Economic and Social Council resolution 1990/26,

Noting with appreciation the participation of many States, specialized agencies, intergovernmental bodies and non-governmental organizations, especially organizations of disabled persons, in the deliberations of the working group,

Also noting with appreciation the generous financial contributions of Member States to the working group,

Welcoming the fact that the working group was able to fulfil its mandate within three sessions of five working days each,

Acknowledging with appreciation the report of the ad hoc open-ended working group to elaborate standard rules on the equalization of opportunities for persons with disabilities,

Taking note of the discussion in the Commission for Social Development at its thirty-third session on the draft standard rules contained in the report of the working group,

1. Adopts the Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities, set forth in the annex to the present resolution;

2. Requests Member States to apply the Rules in developing national disability programmes;

3. Urges Member States to meet the requests of the Special Rapporteur for information on the implementation of the Rules;

4. Requests the Secretary-General to promote the implementation of the Rules and to report thereon to the General Assembly at its fiftieth session;

5. Urges Member States to support, financially and otherwise, the implementation of the Rules.

ANNEX

INTRODUCTION

1. There are persons with disabilities in all parts of the world and at all levels in every society. The number of persons with disabilities in the world is large and is growing.

2. Both the causes and the consequences of disability vary throughout the world. Those variations are the result of different socio-economic circumstances and of the different provisions that States make for the well-being of their citizens.

3. Present disability policy is the result of developments over the past 200 years. In many ways it reflects the general living conditions and social and economic policies of different times. In the disability field, however, there are also many specific circumstances that have influenced the living conditions of persons with disabilities. Ignorance, neglect, superstition and fear are social factors that throughout the history of disability have isolated persons with disabilities and delayed their development.

4. Over the years disability policy developed from elementary care at institutions to education for children with disabilities and rehabilitation for persons who became disabled during adult life.

Through education and rehabilitation, persons with disabilities became more active and a driving force in the further development of disability policy. Organizations of persons with disabilities, their families and advocates were formed, which advocated better conditions for persons with disabilities. After the Second World War the concepts of integration and normalization were introduced, which reflected a growing awareness of the capabilities of persons with disabilities.

5. Towards the end of the 1960s organizations of persons with disabilities in some countries started to formulate a new concept of disability. That new concept indicated the close connection between the limitation experienced by individuals with disabilities, the design and structure of their environments and the attitude of the general population. At the same time the problems of disability in developing countries were more and more highlighted. In some of those countries the percentage of the population with disabilities was estimated to be very high and, for the most part, persons with disabilities were extremely poor.

6. The rights of persons with disabilities have been the subject of much attention in the United Nations and other international organizations over a long period of time. The most important outcome of the International Year of Disabled Persons, 1981, was the World Programme of Action concerning Disabled Persons, adopted by the General Assembly by its resolution 37/52 of 3 December 1982. The Year and the World Programme of Action provided a strong impetus for progress in the field. They both emphasized the right of persons with disabilities to the same opportunities as other citizens and to an equal share in the improvements in living conditions resulting from economic and social development. There also, for the first time, handicap was defined as a function of the relationship between persons with disabilities and their environment.

7. The Global Meeting of Experts to Review the Implementation of the World Programme of Action concerning Disabled Persons at the Mid-Point of the United Nations Decade of Disabled Persons was held at Stockholm in 1987. It was suggested at the Meeting that a guiding philosophy should be developed to indicate the priorities for action in the years ahead. The basis of that philosophy should be the recognition of the rights of persons with disabilities.

8. Consequently, the Meeting recommended that the General Assembly convene a special

conference to draft an international convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination

against persons with disabilities, to be ratified by States by the end of the Decade.

9. A draft outline of the convention was prepared by Italy and presented to the General Assembly

at its forty-second session. Further presentations concerning a draft convention were made by

Sweden at the forty-fourth session of the Assembly. However, on both occasions, no consensus

could be reached on the suitability of such a convention. In the opinion of many representatives,

existing human rights documents seemed to guarantee persons with disabilities the same rights as

other persons.

10. Guided by the deliberations in the General Assembly, the Economic and Social Council, at its

first regular session of 1990, finally agreed to concentrate on the elaboration of an international

instrument of a different kind. By its resolution 1990/26 of 24 May 1990, the Council authorized

the Commission for Social Development to consider, at its thirty-second session, the establishment

of an ad hoc open-ended working group of government experts, funded by voluntary contributions,

to elaborate standard rules on the equalization of opportunities for disabled children, youth and

adults, in close collaboration with the specialized agencies, other intergovernmental bodies and

non-governmental organizations, especially organizations of disabled persons. The Council also

requested the Commission to finalize the text of those rules for consideration in 1993 and for

submission to the General Assembly at its forty-eighth session.

11. The subsequent discussions in the Third Committee of the General Assembly at the forty-fifth

session showed that there was wide support for the new initiative to elaborate standard rules on the

equalization of opportunities for persons with disabilities.

12. At the thirty-second session of the Commission for Social Development, the initiative for

standard rules received the support of a large number of representatives and discussions led to the

adoption of resolution 32/2 of 20 February 1991, in which the Commission decided to establish an

ad hoc open-ended working group in accordance with Economic and Social Council resolution

1990/26.

13. The Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities have

been developed on the basis of the experience gained during the United Nations Decade of

Disabled Persons (1983-1992). The International Bill of Human Rights, comprising the Universal

Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights

and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the Convention on the Rights of the

Child and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, as

well as the World Programme of Action concerning Disabled Persons, constitute the political and

moral foundation for the Rules.

14. Although the Rules are not compulsory, they can become international customary rules when

they are applied by a great number of States with the intention of respecting a rule in international

law. They imply a strong moral and political commitment on behalf of States to take action for the

equalization of opportunities for persons with disabilities. Important principles for responsibility,

action and cooperation are indicated. Areas of decisive importance for the quality of life and for the

achievement of full participation and equality are pointed out. The Rules offer an instrument for

policy-making and action to persons with disabilities and their organizations. They provide a basis

for technical and economic cooperation among States, the United Nations and other international

organizations.

15. The purpose of the Rules is to ensure that girls, boys, women and men with disabilities, as

members of their societies, may exercise the same rights and obligations as others. In all societies

of the world there are still obstacles preventing persons with disabilities from exercising their rights

and freedoms and making it difficult for them to participate fully in the activities of their societies.

It is the responsibility of States to take appropriate action to remove such obstacles. Persons with

disabilities and their organizations should play an active role as partners in this process. The

equalization of opportunities for persons with disabilities is an essential contribution in the general

and worldwide effort to mobilize human resources. Special attention may need to be directed

towards groups such as women, children, the elderly, the poor, migrant workers, persons with dual

or multiple disabilities, indigenous people and ethnic minorities. In addition, there are a large

number of refugees with disabilities who have special needs requiring attention.

16. The concepts set out below appear throughout the Rules. They are essentially built on the

concepts in the World Programme of Action concerning Disabled Persons. In some cases they

reflect the development that has taken place during the United Nations Decade of Disabled Persons.

17. The term "disability" summarizes a great number of different functional limitations occurring

in any population in any country of the world. People may be disabled by physical, intellectual or

sensory impairment, medical conditions or mental illness. Such impairments, conditions or

illnesses may be permanent or transitory in nature.

18. The term "handicap" means the loss or limitation of opportunities to take part in the life of the

community on an equal level with others. It describes the encounter between the person with a

disability and the environment. The purpose of this term is to emphasize the focus on the

shortcomings in the environment and in many organized activities in society, for example,

information, communication and education, which prevent persons with disabilities from

participating on equal terms.

19. The use of the two terms "disability" and "handicap", as defined in paragraphs 17 and 18

above, should be seen in the light of modern disability history. During the 1970s there was a strong

reaction among representatives of organizations of persons with disabilities and professionals in the

field of disability against the terminology of the time. The terms "disability" and "handicap" were

often used in an unclear and confusing way, which gave poor guidance for policy-making and for

political action. The terminology reflected a medical and diagnostic approach, which ignored the

imperfections and deficiencies of the surrounding society.

20. In 1980, the World Health Organization adopted an international classification of impairments,

disabilities and handicaps, which suggested a more precise and at the same time relativistic

approach. The International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps makes a

clear distinction between "impairment", "disability" and "handicap". It has been extensively used in

areas such as rehabilitation, education, statistics, policy, legislation, demography, sociology,

economics and anthropology. Some users have expressed concern that the Classification, in its

definition of the term "handicap", may still be considered too medical and too centred on the

individual, and may not adequately clarify the interaction between societal conditions or

expectations and the abilities of the individual. Those concerns, and others expressed by users

during the 12 years since its publication, will be addressed in forthcoming revisions of the

Classification.

21. As a result of experience gained in the implementation of the World Programme of Action and

of the general discussion that took place during the United Nations Decade of Disabled Persons,

there was a deepening of knowledge and extension of understanding concerning disability issues

and the terminology used. Current terminology recognizes the necessity of addressing both the

individual needs (such as rehabilitation and technical aids) and the shortcomings of the society

(various obstacles for participation).

22. The term "prevention" means action aimed at preventing the occurrence of physical, intellectual,

psychiatric or sensory impairments (primary prevention) or at preventing impairments from

causing a permanent functional limitation or disability (secondary prevention). Prevention may

include many different types of action, such as primary health care, prenatal and postnatal care,

education in nutrition, immunization campaigns against communicable diseases, measures to

control endemic diseases, safety regulations, programmes for the prevention of accidents in

different environments, including adaptation of workplaces to prevent occupational disabilities and

diseases, and prevention of disability resulting from pollution of the environment or armed conflict.

23. The term "rehabilitation" refers to a process aimed at enabling persons with disabilities to reach

and maintain their optimal physical, sensory, intellectual, psychiatric and/or social functional levels,

thus providing them with the tools to change their lives towards a higher level of independence.

Rehabilitation may include measures to provide and/or restore functions, or compensate for the

loss or absence of a function or for a functional limitation. The rehabilitation process does not

involve initial medical care. It includes a wide range of measures and activities from more basic

and general rehabilitation to goal-oriented activities, for instance vocational rehabilitation.

24. The term "equalization of opportunities" means the process through which the various systems

of society and the environment, such as services, activities, information and documentation, are

made available to all, particularly to persons with disabilities.

25. The principle of equal rights implies that the needs of each and every individual are of equal

importance, that those needs must be made the basis for the planning of societies and that all

resources must be employed in such a way as to ensure that every individual has equal opportunity

for participation.

26. Persons with disabilities are members of society and have the right to remain within their local

communities. They should receive the support they need within the ordinary structures of

education, health, employment and social services.

27. As persons with disabilities achieve equal rights, they should also have equal obligations. As

those rights are being achieved, societies should raise their expectations of persons with disabilities.

As part of the process of equal opportunities, provision should be made to assist persons with

disabilities to assume their full responsibility as members of society.

PREAMBLE

States,

Mindful of the pledge made, under the Charter of the United Nations, to take joint and separate

action in cooperation with the Organization to promote higher standards of living, full employment,

and conditions of economic and social progress and development,

Reaffirming the commitment to human rights and fundamental freedoms, social justice and the

dignity and worth of the human person proclaimed in the Charter,

Recalling in particular the international standards on human rights, which have been laid down in

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and

Cultural Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,

Underlining that those instruments proclaim that the rights recognized therein should be ensured

equally to all individuals without discrimination,

Recalling the Convention on the Rights of the Child, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of

disability and requires special measures to ensure the rights of children with disabilities, and the

International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of

Their Families, which provides for some protective measures against disability,

Recalling also the provisions in the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination

against Women to ensure the rights of girls and women with disabilities,

Having regard to the Declaration on the Rights of Disabled Persons, the Declaration on the Rights

of Mentally Retarded Persons, the Declaration on Social Progress and Development, the Principles

for the Protection of Persons with Mental Illness and for the Improvement of Mental Health Care

and other relevant instruments adopted by the General Assembly,

Also having regard to the relevant conventions and recommendations adopted by the International

Labour Organisation, with particular reference to participation in employment without

discrimination for persons with disabilities,

Mindful of the relevant recommendations and work of the United Nations Educational, Scientific

and Cultural Organization, in particular the World Declaration on Education for All, the World

Health Organization, the United Nations Children's Fund and other concerned organizations,

Having regard to the commitment made by States concerning the protection of the environment,

Mindful of the devastation caused by armed conflict and deploring the use of scarce resources in

the production of weapons,

Recognizing that the World Programme of Action concerning Disabled Persons and the definition

therein of equalization of opportunities represent earnest ambitions on the part of the international

community to render those various international instruments and recommendations of practical and

concrete significance,

Acknowledging that the objective of the United Nations Decade of Disabled Persons (1983-1992)

to implement the World Programme of Action is still valid and requires urgent and continued

action,

Recalling that the World Programme of Action is based on concepts that are equally valid in

developing and industrialized countries,

Convinced that intensified efforts are needed to achieve the full and equal enjoyment of human

rights and participation in society by persons with disabilities,

Re-emphasizing that persons with disabilities, and their parents, guardians, advocates and

organizations, must be active partners with States in the planning and implementation of all

measures affecting their civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights,

In pursuance of Economic and Social Council resolution 1990/26, and basing themselves on the

specific measures required for the attainment by persons with disabilities of equality with others,

enumerated in detail in the World Programme of Action,

Have adopted the Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities

outlined below, in order:

(a) To stress that all action in the field of disability presupposes adequate knowledge and experience

of the conditions and special needs of persons with disabilities;

(b) To emphasize that the process through which every aspect of societal organization is made

accessible to all is a basic objective of socio-economic development;

(c) To outline crucial aspects of social policies in the field of disability, including, as appropriate,

the active encouragement of technical and economic cooperation;

(d) To provide models for the political decision-making process required for the attainment of

equal opportunities, bearing in mind the widely differing technical and economic levels, the fact that

the process must reflect keen understanding of the cultural context within which it takes place and

the crucial role of persons with disabilities in it;

(e) To propose national mechanisms for close collaboration among States, the organs of the United

Nations system, other intergovernmental bodies and organizations of persons with disabilities;

(f) To propose an effective machinery for monitoring the process by which States seek to attain the

equalization of opportunities for persons with disabilities.

States should take action to raise awareness in society about persons with disabilities, their rights,

their needs, their potential and their contribution.

1. States should ensure that responsible authorities distribute up-to-date information on available

programmes and services to persons with disabilities, their families, professionals in the field and

the general public. Information to persons with disabilities should be presented in accessible form.

2. States should initiate and support information campaigns concerning persons with disabilities

and disability policies, conveying the message that persons with disabilities are citizens with the

same rights and obligations as others, thus justifying measures to remove all obstacles to full

participation.

3. States should encourage the portrayal of persons with disabilities by the mass media in a positive

way; organizations of persons with disabilities should be consulted on this matter.

4. States should ensure that public education programmes reflect in all their aspects the principle of

full participation and equality.

5. States should invite persons with disabilities and their families and organizations to participate in

public education programmes concerning disability matters.

6. States should encourage enterprises in the private sector to include disability issues in all aspects

of their activity.

7. States should initiate and promote programmes aimed at raising the level of awareness of

persons with disabilities concerning their rights and potential. Increased self-reliance and

empowerment will assist persons with disabilities to take advantage of the opportunities available

to them.

8. Awareness-raising should be an important part of the education of children with disabilities and

in rehabilitation programmes. Persons with disabilities could also assist one another in

awareness-raising through the activities of their own organizations.

9. Awareness-raising should be part of the education of all children and should be a component of

teacher-training courses and training of all professionals.

States should ensure the provision of effective medical care to persons with disabilities.

1. States should work towards the provision of programmes run by multidisciplinary teams of

professionals for early detection, assessment and treatment of impairment. This could prevent,

reduce or eliminate disabling effects. Such programmes should ensure the full participation of

persons with disabilities and their families at the individual level, and of organizations of persons

with disabilities at the planning and evaluation level.

2. Local community workers should be trained to participate in areas such as early detection of

impairments, the provision of primary assistance and referral to appropriate services.

3. States should ensure that persons with disabilities, particularly infants and children, are provided

with the same level of medical care within the same system as other members of society.

4. States should ensure that all medical and paramedical personnel are adequately trained and

equipped to give medical care to persons with disabilities and that they have access to relevant

treatment methods and technology.

5. States should ensure that medical, paramedical and related personnel are adequately trained so

that they do not give inappropriate advice to parents, thus restricting options for their children. This

training should be an ongoing process and should be based on the latest information available.

6. States should ensure that persons with disabilities are provided with any regular treatment and

medicines they may need to preserve or improve their level of functioning.

States should ensure the provision of rehabilitation services to persons with disabilities in order for

them to reach and sustain their optimum level of independence and functioning.

1. States should develop national rehabilitation programmes for all groups of persons with

disabilities. Such programmes should be based on the actual individual needs of persons with

disabilities and on the principles of full participation and equality.

2. Such programmes should include a wide range of activities, such as basic skills training to

improve or compensate for an affected function, counselling of persons with disabilities and their

families, developing self-reliance, and occasional services such as assessment and guidance.

3. All persons with disabilities, including persons with severe and/or multiple disabilities, who

require rehabilitation should have access to it.

4. Persons with disabilities and their families should be able to participate in the design and

organization of rehabilitation services concerning themselves.

5. All rehabilitation services should be available in the local community where the person with

disabilities lives. However, in some instances, in order to attain a certain training objective, special

time-limited rehabilitation courses may be organized, where appropriate, in residential form.

6. Persons with disabilities and their families should be encouraged to involve themselves in

rehabilitation, for instance as trained teachers, instructors or counsellors.

7. States should draw upon the expertise of organizations of persons with disabilities when

formulating or evaluating rehabilitation programmes.

States should ensure the development and supply of support services, including assistive devices

for persons with disabilities, to assist them to increase their level of independence in their daily

living and to exercise their rights.

1. States should ensure the provision of assistive devices and equipment, personal assistance and

interpreter services, according to the needs of persons with disabilities, as important measures to

achieve the equalization of opportunities.

2. States should support the development, production, distribution and servicing of assistive

devices and equipment and the dissemination of knowledge about them.

3. To achieve this, generally available technical know-how should be utilized. In States where

high-technology industry is available, it should be fully utilized to improve the standard and

effectiveness of assistive devices and equipment. It is important to stimulate the development and

production of simple and inexpensive devices, using local material and local production facilities

when possible. Persons with disabilities themselves could be involved in the production of those

devices.

4. States should recognize that all persons with disabilities who need assistive devices should have

access to them as appropriate, including financial accessibility. This may mean that assistive

devices and equipment should be provided free of charge or at such a low price that persons with

disabilities or their families can afford to buy them.

5. In rehabilitation programmes for the provision of assistive devices and equipment, States should

consider the special requirements of girls and boys with disabilities concerning the design,

durability and age-appropriateness of assistive devices and equipment.

6. States should support the development and provision of personal assistance programmes and

interpretation services, especially for persons with severe and/or multiple disabilities. Such

programmes would increase the level of participation of persons with disabilities in everyday life at

home, at work, in school and during leisure-time activities.

7. Personal assistance programmes should be designed in such a way that the persons with

disabilities using the programmes have a decisive influence on the way in which the programmes

are delivered.

States should recognize the overall importance of accessibility in the process of the equalization of

opportunities in all spheres of society. For persons with disabilities of any kind, States should (a)

introduce programmes of action to make the physical environment accessible; and (b) undertake

measures to provide access to information and communication.

(a) Access to the physical environment

1. States should initiate measures to remove the obstacles to participation in the physical

environment. Such measures should be to develop standards and guidelines and to consider

enacting legislation to ensure accessibility to various areas in society, such as housing, buildings,

public transport services and other means of transportation, streets and other outdoor

environments.

2. States should ensure that architects, construction engineers and others who are professionally

involved in the design and construction of the physical environment have access to adequate

information on disability policy and measures to achieve accessibility.

3. Accessibility requirements should be included in the design and construction of the physical

environment from the beginning of the designing process.

4. Organizations of persons with disabilities should be consulted when standards and norms for

accessibility are being developed. They should also be involved locally from the initial planning

stage when public construction projects are being designed, thus ensuring maximum accessibility.

(b) Access to information and communication

5. Persons with disabilities and, where appropriate, their families and advocates should have access

to full information on diagnosis, rights and available services and programmes, at all stages. Such

information should be presented in forms accessible to persons with disabilities.

6. States should develop strategies to make information services and documentation accessible for

different groups of persons with disabilities. Braille, tape services, large print and other appropriate

technologies should be used to provide access to written information and documentation for

persons with visual impairments. Similarly, appropriate technologies should be used to provide

access to spoken information for persons with auditory impairments or comprehension difficulties.

7. Consideration should be given to the use of sign language in the education of deaf children, in

their families and communities. Sign language interpretation services should also be provided to

facilitate the communication between deaf persons and others.

8. Consideration should also be given to the needs of people with other communication disabilities.

9. States should encourage the media, especially television, radio and newspapers, to make their

services accessible.

10. States should ensure that new computerized information and service systems offered to the

general public are either made initially accessible or are adapted to be made accessible to persons

with disabilities.

11. Organizations of persons with disabilities should be consulted when measures to make

information services accessible are being developed.

States should recognize the principle of equal primary, secondary and tertiary educational

opportunities for children, youth and adults with disabilities, in integrated settings. They should

ensure that the education of persons with disabilities is an integral part of the educational system.

1. General educational authorities are responsible for the education of persons with disabilities in

integrated settings. Education for persons with disabilities should form an integral part of national

educational planning, curriculum development and school organization.

2. Education in mainstream schools presupposes the provision of interpreter and other appropriate

support services. Adequate accessibility and support services, designed to meet the needs of

persons with different disabilities, should be provided.

3. Parent groups and organizations of persons with disabilities should be involved in the education

process at all levels.

4. In States where education is compulsory it should be provided to girls and boys with all kinds

and all levels of disabilities, including the most severe.

5. Special attention should be given in the following areas:

(a) Very young children with disabilities;

(b) Pre-school children with disabilities;

(c) Adults with disabilities, particularly women.

6. To accommodate educational provisions for persons with disabilities in the mainstream, States

should:

(a) Have a clearly stated policy, understood and accepted at the school level and by the wider

community;

(b) Allow for curriculum flexibility, addition and adaptation;

(c) Provide for quality materials, ongoing teacher training and support teachers.

7. Integrated education and community-based programmes should be seen as complementary

approaches in providing cost-effective education and training for persons with disabilities. National

community-based programmes should encourage communities to use and develop their resources

to provide local education to persons with disabilities.

8. In situations where the general school system does not yet adequately meet the needs of all

persons with disabilities, special education may be considered. It should be aimed at preparing

students for education in the general school system. The quality of such education should reflect the

same standards and ambitions as general education and should be closely linked to it. At a

minimum, students with disabilities should be afforded the same portion of educational resources

as students without disabilities. States should aim for the gradual integration of special education

services into mainstream education. It is acknowledged that in some instances special education

may currently be considered to be the most appropriate form of education for some students with

disabilities.

9. Owing to the particular communication needs of deaf and deaf/blind persons, their education

may be more suitably provided in schools for such persons or special classes and units in

mainstream schools. At the initial stage, in particular, special attention needs to be focused on

culturally sensitive instruction that will result in effective communication skills and maximum

independence for people who are deaf or deaf/blind.

States should recognize the principle that persons with disabilities must be empowered to exercise

their human rights, particularly in the field of employment. In both rural and urban areas they must

have equal opportunities for productive and gainful employment in the labour market.

1. Laws and regulations in the employment field must not discriminate against persons with

disabilities and must not raise obstacles to their employment.

2. States should actively support the integration of persons with disabilities into open employment.

This active support could occur through a variety of measures, such as vocational training,

incentive-oriented quota schemes, reserved or designated employment, loans or grants for small

business, exclusive contracts or priority production rights, tax concessions, contract compliance or

other technical or financial assistance to enterprises employing workers with disabilities. States

should also encourage employers to make reasonable adjustments to accommodate persons with

disabilities.

3. States' action programmes should include:

(a) Measures to design and adapt workplaces and work premises in such a way that they become

accessible to persons with different disabilities;

(b) Support for the use of new technologies and the development and production of assistive

devices, tools and equipment and measures to facilitate access to such devices and equipment for

persons with disabilities to enable them to gain and maintain employment;

(c) Provision of appropriate training and placement and ongoing support such as personal

assistance and interpreter services.

4. States should initiate and support public awareness-raising campaigns designed to overcome

negative attitudes and prejudices concerning workers with disabilities.

5. In their capacity as employers, States should create favourable conditions for the employment of

persons with disabilities in the public sector.

6. States, workers' organizations and employers should cooperate to ensure equitable recruitment

and promotion policies, employment conditions, rates of pay, measures to improve the work

environment in order to prevent injuries and impairments and measures for the rehabilitation of

employees who have sustained employment-related injuries.

7. The aim should always be for persons with disabilities to obtain employment in the open labour

market. For persons with disabilities whose needs cannot be met in open employment, small units

of sheltered or supported employment may be an alternative. It is important that the quality of such

programmes be assessed in terms of their relevance and sufficiency in providing opportunities for

persons with disabilities to gain employment in the labour market.

8. Measures should be taken to include persons with disabilities in training and employment

programmes in the private and informal sectors.

9. States, workers' organizations and employers should cooperate with organizations of persons

with disabilities concerning all measures to create training and employment opportunities, including

flexible hours, part-time work, job-sharing, self-employment and attendant care for persons with

disabilities.

States are responsible for the provision of social security and income maintenance for persons with

disabilities.

1. States should ensure the provision of adequate income support to persons with disabilities who,

owing to disability or disability-related factors, have temporarily lost or received a reduction in their

income or have been denied employment opportunities. States should ensure that the provision of

support takes into account the costs frequently incurred by persons with disabilities and their

families as a result of the disability.

2. In countries where social security, social insurance or other social welfare schemes exist or are

being developed for the general population, States should ensure that such systems do not exclude

or discriminate against persons with disabilities.

3. States should also ensure the provision of income support and social security protection to

individuals who undertake the care of a person with a disability.

4. Social security systems should include incentives to restore the income-earning capacity of

persons with disabilities. Such systems should provide or contribute to the organization,

development and financing of vocational training. They should also assist with placement services.

5. Social security programmes should also provide incentives for persons with disabilities to seek

employment in order to establish or re-establish their income-earning capacity.

6. Income support should be maintained as long as the disabling conditions remain in a manner

that does not discourage persons with disabilities from seeking employment. It should only be

reduced or terminated when persons with disabilities achieve adequate and secure income.

7. States, in countries where social security is to a large extent provided by the private sector,

should encourage local communities, welfare organizations and families to develop self-help

measures and incentives for employment or employment-related activities for persons with

disabilities.

States should promote the full participation of persons with disabilities in family life. They should

promote their right to personal integrity and ensure that laws do not discriminate against persons

with disabilities with respect to sexual relationships, marriage and parenthood.

1. Persons with disabilities should be enabled to live with their families. States should encourage

the inclusion in family counselling of appropriate modules regarding disability and its effects on

family life. Respite-care and attendant-care services should be made available to families which

include a person with disabilities. States should remove all unnecessary obstacles to persons who

want to foster or adopt a child or adult with disabilities.

2. Persons with disabilities must not be denied the opportunity to experience their sexuality, have

sexual relationships and experience parenthood. Taking into account that persons with disabilities

may experience difficulties in getting married and setting up a family, States should encourage the

availability of appropriate counselling. Persons with disabilities must have the same access as

others to family-planning methods, as well as to information in accessible form on the sexual

functioning of their bodies.

3. States should promote measures to change negative attitudes towards marriage, sexuality and

parenthood of persons with disabilities, especially of girls and women with disabilities, which still

prevail in society. The media should be encouraged to play an important role in removing such

negative attitudes.

4. Persons with disabilities and their families need to be fully informed about taking precautions

against sexual and other forms of abuse. Persons with disabilities are particularly vulnerable to

abuse in the family, community or institutions and need to be educated on how to avoid the

occurrence of abuse, recognize when abuse has occurred and report on such acts.

States will ensure that persons with disabilities are integrated into and can participate in cultural

activities on an equal basis.

1. States should ensure that persons with disabilities have the opportunity to utilize their creative,

artistic and intellectual potential, not only for their own benefit, but also for the enrichment of their

community, be they in urban or rural areas. Examples of such activities are dance, music, literature,

theatre, plastic arts, painting and sculpture. Particularly in developing countries, emphasis should be

placed on traditional and contemporary art forms, such as puppetry, recitation and story-telling.

2. States should promote the accessibility to and availability of places for cultural performances and

services, such as theatres, museums, cinemas and libraries, to persons with disabilities.

3. States should initiate the development and use of special technical arrangements to make

literature, films and theatre accessible to persons with disabilities.

States will take measures to ensure that persons with disabilities have equal opportunities for

recreation and sports.

1. States should initiate measures to make places for recreation and sports, hotels, beaches, sports

arenas, gym halls, etc., accessible to persons with disabilities. Such measures should encompass

support for staff in recreation and sports programmes, including projects to develop methods of

accessibility, and participation, information and training programmes.

2. Tourist authorities, travel agencies, hotels, voluntary organizations and others involved in

organizing recreational activities or travel opportunities should offer their services to all, taking into

account the special needs of persons with disabilities. Suitable training should be provided to assist

that process.

3. Sports organizations should be encouraged to develop opportunities for participation by persons

with disabilities in sports activities. In some cases, accessibility measures could be enough to open

up opportunities for participation. In other cases, special arrangements or special games would be

needed. States should support the participation of persons with disabilities in national and

international events.

4. Persons with disabilities participating in sports activities should have access to instruction and

training of the same quality as other participants.

5. Organizers of sports and recreation should consult with organizations of persons with disabilities

when developing their services for persons with disabilities.

States will encourage measures for equal participation by persons with disabilities in the religious

life of their communities.

1. States should encourage, in consultation with religious authorities, measures to eliminate

discrimination and make religious activities accessible to persons with disabilities.

2. States should encourage the distribution of information on disability matters to religious

institutions and organizations. States should also encourage religious authorities to include

information on disability policies in the training for religious professions, as well as in religious

education programmes.

3. They should also encourage the accessibility of religious literature to persons with sensory

impairments.

4. States and/or religious organizations should consult with organizations of persons with

disabilities when developing measures for equal participation in religious activities.

States assume the ultimate responsibility for the collection and dissemination of information on the

living conditions of persons with disabilities and promote comprehensive research on all aspects,

including obstacles that affect the lives of persons with disabilities.

1. States should, at regular intervals, collect gender-specific statistics and other information

concerning the living conditions of persons with disabilities. Such data collection could be

conducted in conjunction with national censuses and household surveys and could be undertaken in

close collaboration, inter alia, with universities, research institutes and organizations of persons

with disabilities. The data collection should include questions on programmes and services and

their use.

2. States should consider establishing a data bank on disability, which would include statistics on

available services and programmes as well as on the different groups of persons with disabilities.

They should bear in mind the need to protect individual privacy and personal integrity.

3. States should initiate and support programmes of research on social, economic and participation

issues that affect the lives of persons with disabilities and their families. Such research should

include studies on the causes, types and frequencies of disabilities, the availability and efficacy of

existing programmes and the need for development and evaluation of services and support

measures.

4. States should develop and adopt terminology and criteria for the conduct of national surveys, in

cooperation with organizations of persons with disabilities.

5. States should facilitate the participation of persons with disabilities in data collection and

research. To undertake such research States should particularly encourage the recruitment of

qualified persons with disabilities.

6. States should support the exchange of research findings and experiences.

7. States should take measures to disseminate information and knowledge on disability to all

political and administration levels within national, regional and local spheres.

States will ensure that disability aspects are included in all relevant policy-making and national

planning.

1. States should initiate and plan adequate policies for persons with disabilities at the national level,

and stimulate and support action at regional and local levels.

2. States should involve organizations of persons with disabilities in all decision-making relating to

plans and programmes concerning persons with disabilities or affecting their economic and social

status.

3. The needs and concerns of persons with disabilities should be incorporated into general

development plans and not be treated separately.

4. The ultimate responsibility of States for the situation of persons with disabilities does not relieve

others of their responsibility. Anyone in charge of services, activities or the provision of

information in society should be encouraged to accept responsibility for making such programmes

available to persons with disabilities.

5. States should facilitate the development by local communities of programmes and measures for

persons with disabilities. One way of doing this could be to develop manuals or check-lists and

provide training programmes for local staff.

States have a responsibility to create the legal bases for measures to achieve the objectives of full

participation and equality for persons with disabilities.

1. National legislation, embodying the rights and obligations of citizens, should include the rights

and obligations of persons with disabilities. States are under an obligation to enable persons with

disabilities to exercise their rights, including their human, civil and political rights, on an equal basis

with other citizens. States must ensure that organizations of persons with disabilities are involved in

the development of national legislation concerning the rights of persons with disabilities, as well as

in the ongoing evaluation of that legislation.

2. Legislative action may be needed to remove conditions that may adversely affect the lives of

persons with disabilities, including harassment and victimization. Any discriminatory provisions

against persons with disabilities must be eliminated. National legislation should provide for

appropriate sanctions in case of violations of the principles of non-discrimination.

3. National legislation concerning persons with disabilities may appear in two different forms. The

rights and obligations may be incorporated in general legislation or contained in special legislation.

Special legislation for persons with disabilities may be established in several ways:

(a) By enacting separate legislation, dealing exclusively with disability matters;

(b) By including disability matters within legislation on particular topics;

(c) By mentioning persons with disabilities specifically in the texts that serve to interpret existing

legislation.

A combination of those different approaches might be desirable. Affirmative action provisions

may also be considered.

4. States may consider establishing formal statutory complaints mechanisms in order to protect the

interests of persons with disabilities.

States have the financial responsibility for national programmes and measures to create equal

opportunities for persons with disabilities.

1. States should include disability matters in the regular budgets of all national, regional and local

government bodies.

2. States, non-governmental organizations and other interested bodies should interact to determine

the most effective ways of supporting projects and measures relevant to persons with disabilities.

3. States should consider the use of economic measures (loans, tax exemptions, earmarked grants,

special funds, and so on) to stimulate and support equal participation by persons with disabilities in

society.

4. In many States it may be advisable to establish a disability development fund, which could

support various pilot projects and self-help programmes at the grass-roots level.

States are responsible for the establishment and strengthening of national coordinating committees,

or similar bodies, to serve as a national focal point on disability matters.

1. The national coordinating committee or similar bodies should be permanent and based on legal

as well as appropriate administrative regulation.

2. A combination of representatives of private and public organizations is most likely to achieve an

intersectoral and multidisciplinary composition. Representatives could be drawn from concerned

government ministries, organizations of persons with disabilities and non-governmental

organizations.

3. Organizations of persons with disabilities should have considerable influence in the national

coordinating committee in order to ensure proper feedback of their concerns.

4. The national coordinating committee should be provided with sufficient autonomy and resources

to fulfil its responsibilities in relation to its decision-making capacities. It should report to the

highest governmental level.

States should recognize the right of the organizations of persons with disabilities to represent

persons with disabilities at national, regional and local levels. States should also recognize the

advisory role of organizations of persons with disabilities in decision-making on disability matters.

1. States should encourage and support economically and in other ways the formation and

strengthening of organizations of persons with disabilities, family members and/or advocates.

States should recognize that those organizations have a role to play in the development of disability

policy.

2. States should establish ongoing communication with organizations of persons with disabilities

and ensure their participation in the development of government policies.

3. The role of organizations of persons with disabilities could be to identify needs and priorities, to

participate in the planning, implementation and evaluation of services and measures concerning the

lives of persons with disabilities, and to contribute to public awareness and to advocate change.

4. As instruments of self-help, organizations of persons with disabilities provide and promote

opportunities for the development of skills in various fields, mutual support among members and

information sharing.

5. Organizations of persons with disabilities could perform their advisory role in many different

ways such as having permanent representation on boards of government-funded agencies, serving

on public commissions and providing expert knowledge on different projects.

6. The advisory role of organizations of persons with disabilities should be ongoing in order to

develop and deepen the exchange of views and information between the State and the

organizations.

7. Organizations should be permanently represented on the national coordinating committee or

similar bodies.

8. The role of local organizations of persons with disabilities should be developed and strengthened

to ensure that they influence matters at the community level.

States are responsible for ensuring the adequate training of personnel, at all levels, involved in the

planning and provision of programmes and services concerning persons with disabilities.

1. States should ensure that all authorities providing services in the disability field give adequate

training to their personnel.

2. In the training of professionals in the disability field, as well as in the provision of information

on disability in general training programmes, the principle of full participation and equality should

be appropriately reflected.

3. States should develop training programmes in consultation with organizations of persons with

disabilities, and persons with disabilities should be involved as teachers, instructors or advisers in

staff training programmes.

4. The training of community workers is of great strategic importance, particularly in developing

countries. It should involve persons with disabilities and include the development of appropriate

values, competence and technologies as well as skills which can be practised by persons with

disabilities, their parents, families and members of the community.

States are responsible for the continuous monitoring and evaluation of the implementation of

national programmes and services concerning the equalization of opportunities for persons with

disabilities.

1. States should periodically and systematically evaluate national disability programmes and

disseminate both the bases and the results of the evaluations.

2. States should develop and adopt terminology and criteria for the evaluation of disability-related

programmes and services.

3. Such criteria and terminology should be developed in close cooperation with organizations of

persons with disabilities from the earliest conceptual and planning stages.

4. States should participate in international cooperation in order to develop common standards for

national evaluation in the disability field. States should encourage national coordinating committees

to participate also.

5. The evaluation of various programmes in the disability field should be built in at the planning

stage, so that the overall efficacy in fulfilling their policy objectives can be evaluated.

States, both industrialized and developing, have the responsibility to cooperate in and take measures

for the improvement of the living conditions of persons with disabilities in developing countries.

1. Measures to achieve the equalization of opportunities of persons with disabilities, including

refugees with disabilities, should be integrated into general development programmes.

2. Such measures must be integrated into all forms of technical and economic cooperation, bilateral

and multilateral, governmental and non-governmental. States should bring up disability issues in

discussions on such cooperation with their counterparts.

3. When planning and reviewing programmes of technical and economic cooperation, special

attention should be given to the effects of such programmes on the situation of persons with

disabilities. It is of the utmost importance that persons with disabilities and their organizations are

consulted on any development projects designed for persons with disabilities. They should be

directly involved in the development, implementation and evaluation of such projects.

4. Priority areas for technical and economic cooperation should include:

(a) The development of human resources through the development of skills, abilities and potentials

of persons with disabilities and the initiation of employment-generating activities for and of

persons with disabilities;

(b) The development and dissemination of appropriate disability-related technologies and

know-how.

5. States are also encouraged to support the formation and strengthening of organizations of

persons with disabilities.

6. States should take measures to improve the knowledge of disability issues among staff involved

at all levels in the administration of technical and economic cooperation programmes.

States will participate actively in international cooperation concerning policies for the equalization of

opportunities for persons with disabilities.

1. Within the United Nations, the specialized agencies and other concerned intergovernmental

organizations, States should participate in the development of disability policy.

2. Whenever appropriate, States should introduce disability aspects in general negotiations

concerning standards, information exchange, development programmes, etc.

3. States should encourage and support the exchange of knowledge and experience among:

(a) Non-governmental organizations concerned with disability issues;

(b) Research institutions and individual researchers involved in disability issues;

(c) Representatives of field programmes and of professional groups in the disability field;

(d) Organizations of persons with disabilities;

(e) National coordinating committees.

4. States should ensure that the United Nations and the specialized agencies, as well as all

intergovernmental and interparliamentary bodies, at global and regional levels, include in their work

the global and regional organizations of persons with disabilities.

1. The purpose of a monitoring mechanism is to further the effective implementation of the Rules.

It will assist each State in assessing its level of implementation of the Rules and in measuring its

progress. The monitoring should identify obstacles and suggest suitable measures that would

contribute to the successful implementation of the Rules. The monitoring mechanism will

recognize the economic, social and cultural features existing in individual States. An important

element should also be the provision of advisory services and the exchange of experience and

information between States.

2. The Rules shall be monitored within the framework of the sessions of the Commission for

Social Development. A Special Rapporteur with relevant and extensive experience in disability

issues and international organizations shall be appointed, if necessary, funded by extrabudgetary

resources, for three years to monitor the implementation of the Rules.

3. International organizations of persons with disabilities having consultative status with the

Economic and Social Council and organizations representing persons with disabilities who have

not yet formed their own organizations should be invited to create among themselves a panel of

experts, on which organizations of persons with disabilities shall have a majority, taking into

account the different kinds of disabilities and necessary equitable geographical distribution, to be

consulted by the Special Rapporteur and, when appropriate, by the Secretariat.

4. The panel of experts will be encouraged by the Special Rapporteur to review, advise and provide

feedback and suggestions on the promotion, implementation and monitoring of the Rules.

5. The Special Rapporteur shall send a set of questions to States, entities within the United Nations

system, and intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations, including organizations of

persons with disabilities. The set of questions should address implementation plans for the Rules in

States. The questions should be selective in nature and cover a number of specific rules for in-depth

evaluation. In preparing the questions the Special Rapporteur should consult with the panel of

experts and the Secretariat.

6. The Special Rapporteur shall seek to establish a direct dialogue not only with States but also with

local non-governmental organizations, seeking their views and comments on any information

intended to be included in the reports. The Special Rapporteur shall provide advisory services on

the implementation and monitoring of the Rules and assistance in the preparation of replies to the

sets of questions.

7. The Department for Policy Coordination and Sustainable Development of the Secretariat, as the

United Nations focal point on disability issues, the United Nations Development Programme and

other entities and mechanisms within the United Nations system, such as the regional

commissions and specialized agencies and inter-agency meetings, shall cooperate with the Special

Rapporteur in the implementation and monitoring of the Rules at the national level.

8. The Special Rapporteur, assisted by the Secretariat, shall prepare reports for submission to the

Commission for Social Development at its thirty-fourth and thirty-fifth sessions. In preparing such

reports, the Rapporteur should consult with the panel of experts.

9. States should encourage national coordinating committees or similar bodies to participate in

implementation and monitoring. As the focal points on disability matters at the national level, they

should be encouraged to establish procedures to coordinate the monitoring of the Rules.

Organizations of persons with disabilities should be encouraged to be actively involved in the

monitoring of the process at all levels.

10. Should extrabudgetary resources be identified, one or more positions of interregional adviser

on the Rules should be created to provide direct services to States, including:

(a) The organization of national and regional training seminars on the content of the Rules;

(b) The development of guidelines to assist in strategies for implementation of the Rules;

(c) Dissemination of information about best practices concerning implementation of the Rules.

11. At its thirty-fourth session, the Commission for Social Development should establish an

open-ended working group to examine the Special Rapporteur's report and make recommendations

on how to improve the application of the Rules. In examining the Special Rapporteur's report, the

Commission, through its open-ended working group, shall consult international organizations of

persons with disabilities and specialized agencies, in accordance with rules 71 and 76 of the rules of

procedure of the functional commissions of the Economic and Social Council.

12. At its session following the end of the Special Rapporteur's mandate, the Commission should

examine the possibility of either renewing that mandate, appointing a new Special Rapporteur or

considering another monitoring mechanism, and should make appropriate recommendations to the

Economic and Social Council.

13. States should be encouraged to contribute to the United Nations